ZANU PF’S REIGN OF TERROR: SPEAK OUT AND FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OR SUFFER IN SILENCE
A whole government spokesperson had to come out and threaten journalists and everyone who dared to talk of how the spectacularly failing, terrorist, tyrannical, authoritarian, illegitimate, parasitic, criminal, pestilential, plundering, looting, self-enrichment obsessed, supreme law of the land violating, mutilating and debasing, people’s welfare neglecting, service delivery depriving Zanu PF was plundering, looting the country’s finite, non-renewable natural resources for self-enrichment, with impunity, empowered by illegitimate power retention. This veiled threat was also a blatant violation of the supreme law of the land, delivered without a hint of remorse.
The oppressed, terrorized, and miserable masses, who have been reduced to mere peasants, are now being silenced about the disastrous impact of the terrorist, tyrannical, authoritarian, illegitimate, parasitic, criminal, pestilential, plundering, looting, self-enrichment obsessed, supreme law of the land violating, mutilating and debasing, people’s welfare neglecting, service delivery depriving Zanu PF on their lives. This is the same party, infested with cancerous, self-serving pests, criminals, and parasites like Charamba, that has neglected their welfare on a wholesale scale and deprived them of prompt, affordable, and reliable services, many of which are fundamental and legitimate constitutional rights. The message is clear: Talk about the plundering and looting, and we will kill you.
However, remaining silent doesn’t guarantee safety either. The people will still die, slowly and in the most gruesome manner, especially if they get diagnosed with cancer, are pregnant, are bitten by a snake, need a critical surgical operation, or have a car accident on a potholed road. The difference lies only in the time it takes for state-sponsored violence or the consequences of Zanu PF’s plundering and looting to liquidate them. This is the only choice left that the partisan, militarized, compromised, and grossly incompetent electoral commission cannot rig on behalf of the terrorist, tyrannical, authoritarian, illegitimate, parasitic, criminal, pestilential, plundering, looting, self-enrichment obsessed, supreme law of the land violating, mutilating and debasing, people’s welfare neglecting, service delivery depriving Zanu PF.
But why such a response from an unconstitutional government that is in power illegitimately? Analyzing this question is key to understanding the nature of the terrorist, tyrannical, authoritarian, illegitimate, parasitic, criminal, pestilential, plundering, looting, self-enrichment obsessed, supreme law of the land violating, mutilating and debasing, people’s welfare neglecting, service delivery depriving Zanu PF. While a detailed analysis requires another piece, briefly, it leads to the conclusion that this criminal enterprise depends heavily on the ignorance of the populace. The government relies on keeping the people unenlightened, preventing them from realizing that the same vile party has no obligation to rule them. In fact, the people have the power to govern themselves through a legitimate government that has their consensus, is responsive to their welfare, and is subservient to the now mutilated, violated, and debased supreme law of the land.
This realization is particularly crucial with the emergence of the reinvigorated, innovative, and resilient opposition led by the youthful Chamisa. His leadership offers hope for a legitimate government that prioritizes the welfare of the people and adheres to the true spirit of the constitution. The people must recognize that their silence only enables the continued plundering and looting by Zanu PF. Speaking out, despite the threats, is a vital step towards reclaiming their rights and ensuring a future where the government serves the people, not the other way around. The choice is stark: remain silent and perish slowly, or speak out and fight for a better, just, and lawful society.
The piece brings much-needed attention to the opposition’s potential to bring about positive change. The focus on Chamisa’s leadership and vision offers a glimmer of hope amidst the grim situation described.
The language used here is excessively harsh and inflammatory. It’s hard to take the author seriously when they resort to such extreme descriptions without presenting balanced evidence.This piece seems more like a rant than a well-reasoned argument. While it’s essential to hold the government accountable, the tone here is too aggressive and lacks professionalism.
Labeling the government as ‘terrorist’ and ‘tyrannical’ is not only reckless but also undermines any legitimate critique. It’s important to use facts and measured language when discussing such serious issues.